<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"  >
<channel>
  <title>Vincent's blog</title>
  <link>http://www.vicentdelft.be/rss</link>
  <description>Vincent's ideas</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 22:04:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
  
   <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 22:04:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20260314</link> 
      <guid>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20260314</guid> 
      <title>I test my new version of Fapws4 against other wsgi solutions and even against apache</title>
      <description>
![Photo by Wang Sheeran on unsplash.com](/static/post/post_20260314/speed.jpg "Photo by Wang Sheeran on unsplash.com")
I've made lot of modificaitons inside Fapws4 those last days/weeks. It remains a strong and very fast WSGI server offering all flexibility of Python. This is mainly than,ks to the libuv library and the picohttp parser. This blog will show how Fapws4 resist to massive requests and to compare results with other SWGI solutions. I will even compare it with apache24.  
</description>
   </item>
   
   <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 18:52:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20240708</link> 
      <guid>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20240708</guid> 
      <title>FAPWS is still in the game ;)</title>
      <description>

It's about 10 years now that I'm using FAPWS as WSGI server. Despite his very simple code base, it's remains the fastest I can test. This surprised me. 
</description>
   </item>
   
   <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2019 21:27:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20191013</link> 
      <guid>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20191013</guid> 
      <title>Fapws4 is running without troubles since 100 days</title>
      <description>
Today it's exactly 100 days that my website is running on top of Fapws4 without any troubles.  
</description>
   </item>
   
   <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 14:34:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20190717</link> 
      <guid>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20190717</guid> 
      <title>Fapws4 a Fast Asynchronous Python Web Server</title>
      <description>
Fapws4 is a re-write of [fapws3](http://www.fapws.org), but using libraries like [libuv](https://github.com/libuv/libuv) and [picohttpparser](https://github.com/h2o/picohttpparser). So, the goal is to build a very fast python web server where most of the processing aspects are written in C. The developer using it, will have to simply write the logic of his web pages in Python.


</description>
   </item>
   
   <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2019 08:22:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20190615</link> 
      <guid>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20190615</guid> 
      <title>In the series of Fast Asynchronous Python web servers</title>
      <description>
As already discussed on this blog, I'm a user of [Fapws3](http://www.fapws.org) since several years. I like his small foot print in memory, simplicity to use in Python. 
But it runs only with Python-2.x and cannot manage correctly POST commands with big files. 

So, I've decided to jump into the C programming language and develop Fapws4. An evolution of Fapws3, that do not have those pain points.

In this blog, I will show you first results of Fapws4

</description>
   </item>
   
   <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2019 21:17:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20190210</link> 
      <guid>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20190210</guid> 
      <title>Fapws versus GO</title>
      <description>
I'm still looking for a replacement to the good old [fapws](http://www.fapws.org) web server. 
So, in this blog, I will put fapws in front of web server written in [Go](https://golang.org)
</description>
   </item>
   
   <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 13:18:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20181101</link> 
      <guid>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20181101</guid> 
      <title>Fast asynchronous python web server is really fast</title>
      <description>
Since several years, I'm using [fapws3](http://www.fapws.org) for few of my websites. Mainly for servers where resources are limited. 

Fapws3 has not received lot of commits since long time, so, this post will show my investigation to find an other tiny and fast python web server running python3

</description>
   </item>
   
   <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 14:49:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20170501</link> 
      <guid>http://www.vincentdelft.be/post/post_20170501</guid> 
      <title>Light webserver</title>
      <description>
In this post I would like to share some feedback concerning the Fast Asynchronous Python Web Server I'm using for this web site. 

Fapws is no more updated since 2012 !!!
Should I migrate to something better: [httpd](http://man.openbsd.org/httpd) ?



</description>
   </item>
   
  </channel>
</rss>